Blog

This is what happens when a Cycling Lobby goes OTT! You live in the world of “wouldn’t it be nice if” and not in the real world. You take over the real world and try to make it the one you want. You ignore the reality. You ignore other people. You even ignore the harm you do to yourselves.

You call this your “Vision”. In Newcastle on Tyne, I call it your mad idea:

 “By 2020, four out of five local journeys will be made by bike, foot or public transport.”  Put another way, only one in five local journeys will be made by car with double the number of those who cycle.

 “We think a street should be designed for residents rather than those driving through, with slower speeds and slower moving traffic , so people are more inclined to walk and cycle for their journeys, some or all of the way .” SUSTRANS Annual Review 2013-2014

Your finely calculated ambition 1,222,177 additional cycle rides endorsed by the city council, today only a few thousand.

You ignore air pollution in towns and cities from traffic, the toxic fumes that kill. The slower you drive the worse the fumes. You ignore the narrowness of UK’s roads, its twisty corners, its roundabouts. You ignore the fact that other people have lives to lead, livings to earn and need to get to their destination as quickly as possible. Your cycle lanes in towns and cities are not continuous. They are intermittent. Like pieces of spaghetti dropped in a bowl of soup. They are not segregated. They are on busy bus routes. They make narrow roads even narrower and add to the congestion. They are often dangerous. They are often empty.

 And worst of all, while you try to be professional, you are the worst kind of amateur. No feasibility study first. No market research – I certainly can’t believe you did any in Newcastle. You don’t cost it. You have the naïve belief that money grows on rhododendron trees. It’s your equal human right to be on the road. Your right yes, on some roads; but not equal, different, and carrying some responsibilities too. Always wearing a helmet. Taking out insurance. Respecting other road users. Not riding on the pavement. Obeying the Highway Code.

And, when you embed yourself in the system you use the system’s own defence system to entrench yourselves. Ombudsmen who should be living up to their name and representing the citizen against the State, writing a load of drivel instead. Solicitors who should be living up to their reputation and serving their clients also writing drivel. Drivel’s not all that easy to write.

As a result, the ratchet. No turning back. Jobs are created. Concept papers written. Imaginary figures dreamed up. Lots of meetings. Whips whipping. Minutes Agreed. Phoney consultation. Protest ignored. Work commissioned. Facts put on the ground. And then more work for the NHS. I’ve seen the ratchet in operation before in relation to Inclusion and special educational needs. It’s recorded at length on my website and in my book.

Sorry, the UK is not Sweden or Denmark. Its towns and cities don’t have wide boulevards. It’s hilly. It can be cold, wet, windy for months – today, as I write this, for example. And people like to shop with a hatchback not a back sack. And arrive at work dry. Kids should reach school safe. And central London’s London – where the only way some people can cost effectively get to work is on a bike. Mercifully other parts of the UK don’t have the same ridiculous property prices. Bus services and underground are good. Central London most certainly not the paradigm for the rest of the UK. Not such a wonderful paradigm for itself.

As I said in my last post, why didn’t you just stick with Vision Zero – promoting cycling where it is healthy with no fatalities or serious injuries in road traffic? Where you could achieve it.

Meanwhile your methodology is positively incestuous The State gives you a mound of money, it gives Local Authorities a mound of money to buy in your services; and Local Authorities give you money to enable them to draft the bid for the money the State gives them. All hush hush locally.

In 1995,£43.5 million from the Millennium Lottery Fund;  In the 2004/05 your income was £23.6 million: £2.1 million from supporters’ donations, £8.5 million from the Department for Transport and a further £2.5 million from the National Opportunities Fund; In 2007 £50m from the Big Lottery’s Living Landmarks to fund Connect2; in 2014/5 of the £114m that Nick Clegg as Deputy Prime Minister announced  to double the number of cyclists on the road by 2020, a chunk I expect directly into your offices and a chunk indirectly as local authorities buy in your services.

On the back of this, your offices: Bristol (head office), London, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Belfast, Peterborough, Nottingham, Birmingham, Newcastle on Tyne, Manchester and Leeds.

You had enlisted as your patrons: : Glenys Kinnock MEP, Rt. Hon Neil Kinnock, Jan Morris CBE, Dr Alex Moulton CBE RDI FREng, Dervla Murphy, Steven Norris, Jonathon Porritt CBE, Richard Rogers, Bettina Selby, Rt. Hon the Lord Waldegrave of North Hill, Rt. Hon Sir George Young MP,  and, Vox Populi , Jeremy Paxman and Jon Snow. It must have helped that you were trying to save the planet.

But the cost.

The Times recently reported a 43% increase in serious injuries to cyclists in UK in last ten years. The BBC recently reported 22,988 accidents including 80 deaths for cyclists in London in last 5 years with a £m of being spent on known accident blackspots that accounted for only 391 of them.

The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents ROSPA said that statistics show:

•  Around 75% of fatal or serious cyclist accidents occur in urban areas
• Around half of cyclist fatalities occur on rural roads
• 75% happen at, or near, a road junction
• 80% occur in daylight
• 80% of cyclist casualties are male
• Almost one quarter of the cyclists killed or injured are children
• Around three quarters of cyclists killed have major head injuries

RoSPA also says

“In 2016, 18,477 cyclists were injured in reported road accidents, including 3,499 who were killed or seriously injured. These figures only include cyclists killed or injured in road accidents that were reported to the police. Many cyclist casualties are not reported to the police, even when the cyclist is injured badly enough to be taken to hospital.

The figures also exclude cycling accidents that occur away from the road. Although the number of deaths is accurate, there could be two or three times as many seriously injured cyclists and double the number of slightly injured.“

Why don’t they both go to NHS A & E for stats of injuries to cyclists by age, sex and type? Or do they prefer not to know.?

A report published by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health: Air pollution is contributing to about 40,000 early deaths a year in the UK. And you want twice as many people to cycle in it.

Last, but by no means least, you make the elementary mistake of the planner. You fail to factor in human fallibility, including your own.

The Media is silent as the grave on your role. Oh, for newspapers like the Times, not now, but when it had as it editor Harold Evans of Thalidomide and Timothy Evans fame, when it successfully challenged the unacceptable and indefensible.

BEWARD LUDDITES ON 2 WHEELS – which is the future?

In my next post, the end of my story, where for me it began. In Newcastle.

PLEASE COPY THE LINK TO YOUR FRIENDS & COLLEAGUES