A Mid-Year Resolution for the Summer Solstice. Never again say that anything British is “the envy of the world”

A Rant from a grumpy old octogenarian OR a Fart after a Good Meal?  You judge.

Not our creaky old Parliament where tradition and the Whips demand that MPs queue for hours to vote instead of pressing a button. Our democracy where a minority interest can pose as a majority. Where popular democracy can degenerate into anarchy and representative democracy into the corporatism of a mutual self-protection society.

 Not our bewigged self-deluded legal system where unequal Justice before the Law rules in the courts, in its Tribunals if at all.

Not our top down, beleaguered NHS monolith that never has enough money and does not want to know about caring for the elderly because in 1948 there were no elderly as we now know them; today a terrible price leaving them in the care of local authorities. 70 year old design faults ignored. Vision impairment compounded by chronic, self-congratulatory, institutionalised inertia. Serious reform outside the political parties’ and bureaucracy’s comfort zone. Thus our NHS does not encourage people to own some responsibility for their own health, and does not look how other countries fund hospitals and care homes. A sacred cow with one leg missing.

Not our civil service where their knowhow is not matched by know-what. Clever, possibly, street wise questionably, accountable not if they can help it. Technology not its strong point.

Not our Ombudsmen system that does not require Ombudsmen to sign off the decisions of apparatchiks written in their name when they are challenged. Ombudsnotmen a better name for them. Make them earn their cake. Wrong decisions mean that red and amber warning lights are set to green.

Not our armed forces thatever since the Crimean War have never seemed to have had equipment right on the day.

Not our ill-disciplined education system – I read Times Ed. It provides an equal opportunity to go to Uni to half a school cohort that wants something entirely different, simply an opportunity in life, any opportunity, not necessarily an equal one, and force-feeds them the wrong curriculum. Labelling them failures when they do not get there. Denying them self-esteem in the ludicrous quest for parity of esteem. Charlie Darwin’s selection politically unacceptable.

Not our Universities when they apply 19th Century nostrums to 21st Century’s problems.

Not our student loans with State Scholarships to reward ambition and much needed talent around in my school days abolished to satisfy the egalitarians, debt slavery making a nonsense of social mobility. Writing off their unpayable debt would be of some comfort to the present generation blighted by covid-19.

Not our planners who never think to factor human fallibility into their planning, especially their own, or just never think. I have a thing about DfT and their amateur planners, Sustrans.

Not our Media. They would all have made a better job of governing; leastways they think they would. Sometimes, they make even God feel threatened. 2008 an illustration of their black/white television view of the world, putting all the blame on the bankers to the total exclusion of politicians who believed that the disadvantaged had an equal right to own their own homes, put them up to it, and shut their eyes to it, promising no return to “the shifting sands of boom and bust.” A shame printers serving IBM supercomputers didn’t print in red as well as black.

Not our political parties, the Tories born to rile, Labour so concerned about equal human rights of those they categorise as disadvantaged – not all of them in their net by a long chalk – that they regularly ignore the rights of everyone else, recently, with scant regard for covid-19. LibDems, nomads in the desert without an oasis. The Greens, Luddites reborn especially when they ride bikes and hate the idea of electric anything, other than bikes and scooters; demonstrating a way of life.

And certainly not the City and the banking and hedge fund fraternity putting its obscene bonus culture before a Transaction Tax. IBM supercomputers work at 200 quadrillion calculations per second. At 0.1% suggested by Michael Bloomberg and Bernie Sanders, a mix more potent than Viagra, I would call it a Teabag tax. Best argument for it an ad for Bitcoin Trader! A good deal better than a hike in Income Tax. It would help countries balance their books and pay their way in the world, I trust not entirely outdated ideas for economists; and put people first for a change.

And please, please, please not another £multi-million Enquiry. Everyone knows too much already. Leave to others the dead hand of the past.

Boris, don’t postpone your new Resolution until 1st January 2021. Good news now. Boost new jobs manufacturing electric vehicles and batteries, bring new hope to the country’s High Streets with tens of thousands of fast chargers located there, opportunities for the young for instance Bring it on 2020, not tax and debt. Care for the elderly within the NHS not outside it. Post Brexit people want a bright future as well as a safe one. Spell it out.

PLEASE SHARE THIS AROUND

Weather Warning for Cycling Enthusiasts. Only for the Brave and Foolhardy.

Do you really believe owners of cars with toxic emissions will want to buy a bike because there is a pop up cycle lane or hire an e.bike or e.scooter without helmet and insurance?

London averages approximately 106 rainy days each year and receives a total of 22.976 inches (583.6 millimeters) of precipitation annually. In the rest of the country, according to the UK Met Office, the average rainfall in Britain is 1,154mm per year. On average it rains for 156.2 days per year (data from 1981 to 2010 ). No wonder metropolitan elite can’t understand.

In 2019, the average wind speed in the UK was 8.2 knots.

Climate change can increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. Flooding is becoming more frequent in the UK.

BEWARE puddles, potholes, occasional flooding and patches of ice.

Urban Cycling is not for the faint-hearted. Only for the brave and foolhardy.

Most people just don’t fancy cycling on UK’s roads despite all the media hype and £1bn+ Austerity spend. Numbers flatlined since 2002 OFFICIAL.

PLEASE SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES

Urban Cycling is not for the faint-hearted. It’s f**** dangerous. But Cyclists are today’s Luddites standing in way of the EV revolution.

 

They don’t want you to know how dangerous cycling is on UK’s narrow, busy, congested urban roads and on narrow lanes between hedgerows in the countryside.

E.cycling and E.scooters is much more dangerous for everyone, especially when no helmet and insurance. The Metropolitan Elite urges them. Yes, book clever, but street wise – no, notably they never ever factoring human fallibity into their planning, especially their own.

 

Read the latest report from The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) a British charity that aims to save lives and prevent life-changing injuries which occur as a result of accidents.

Read latest report from RoSPA

In 2016, 18,477 cyclists were injured in reported road accidents, including 3,499 who were killed or seriously injured. These figures only include cyclists killed or injured in road accidents that were reported to the police. Many cyclist casualties are not reported to the police, even when the cyclist is inured badly enough to be taken to hospital.

The figures also exclude cycling accidents that occur away from the road. Although the number of deaths is accurate, there could be two or three times as many seriously injured cyclists and double the number of slightly injured.

And here’s a bit of stuff and nonsense probably supplied by cycling lobby.

It might be assumed that if the number of pedal cyclists on the road rise, the number of cyclist casualties will rise too. However, research has revealed a ‘safety in numbers’ argument that suggests that this may not be the case.

The safety in numbers approach states that in a mixed traffic environment, the balance of different types of road users can affect the relative risk of injury to individuals, suggesting that if more people cycle; the roads will become less risky for cyclists.

The concept of safety in numbers is not new. It was first demonstrated by Smeed in 1949 with regard to motor vehicles. Smeed argued that data from 62 countries indicated that the number of road fatalities per vehicle was lower in countries with more driving. This concept is now also being applied to cycling. Research by Jacobsen (2003) suggests that when more cyclists are on the road, there are fewer collisions, with data indicating that this is the case in The Netherlands, California and Denmark.

But above that the real world:

In 2018, 99 pedal cyclists were killed, 4,106 seriously injured and 13,345 slightly injured in Great Britain. Although car occupants account for the greatest number of casualties each year, this is unsurprising as cars account for 80% of traffic on Britain’s roads. By looking at casualty rates in terms of the number of casualties per mile travelled, pedal cyclists fall into the ‘vulnerable road users’ category, along with pedestrians and motorcyclists, who have much higher casualty rates per mile travelled than other road users.

Cycling is f**** dangerous – it’s official.

 

WHY DOESN’T RoSPA AND DfT ASK PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND FOR COMPREHENSIVE ACCIDENT STATS FROM THE HOSPITALS WHERE THEY ARE TREATED?

Cycling fanatics have invaded and taken over central and local government  planning departments, the media and beyond. In London they are trying to price cars off the road altogether, deliberately making vehicle journeys longer and slower.
The urgency is to introduce thousands of fast chargers into multi-storey town and city centre car parks to recharge High Street shopping and boost car industry.
Plan for the day after tomorrow not for yesterday.
PLEASE SHARE WITH COLLEAGUES AND FRIENDS